You write, "During the Industrial Revolution, societies had decades to adapt, but modern advancements unfold in months or even weeks."
The great irony is that these developments are being led by really bad engineers.
A good engineer thinking holistically, looking at all factors involved. As example, if a good engineer was designing a car to go 700mph, they will look at every part of the car to determine if it can sustain that speed. They will look for single points of failure. The people leading this revolution don't really give a shit about any of that. They might say they do, but their actions tell another story.
Yes, the technology is racing ahead at an incredible pace. But human beings are not. We're about the same as we were thousands of years ago. We are the single point of failure in this equation. Whatever the limits of human adaptation might be, the AI technologists are determined to race towards them as fast as they possibly can. That kind of brain dead thinking will be their undoing in the end.
You write, "During the Industrial Revolution, societies had decades to adapt, but modern advancements unfold in months or even weeks."
The great irony is that these developments are being led by really bad engineers.
A good engineer thinking holistically, looking at all factors involved. As example, if a good engineer was designing a car to go 700mph, they will look at every part of the car to determine if it can sustain that speed. They will look for single points of failure. The people leading this revolution don't really give a shit about any of that. They might say they do, but their actions tell another story.
Yes, the technology is racing ahead at an incredible pace. But human beings are not. We're about the same as we were thousands of years ago. We are the single point of failure in this equation. Whatever the limits of human adaptation might be, the AI technologists are determined to race towards them as fast as they possibly can. That kind of brain dead thinking will be their undoing in the end.