This was in the back of my head before I started reading your pieces on this topic, but you have very eloquently and persuasively articulated what almost everyone on LessWrong seems determined to ignore.
Thanks so much for sticking to this beat. The doomiest of doomers need someone to push back against their timelines when they ignore the laws of physics.
This was in the back of my head before I started reading your pieces on this topic, but you have very eloquently and persuasively articulated what almost everyone on LessWrong seems determined to ignore.
Thanks so much for sticking to this beat. The doomiest of doomers need someone to push back against their timelines when they ignore the laws of physics.
Thanks. Much of LessWrong seems like it can be summarized as valorizing Bayesian reasoning without actually doing Bayesian reasoning.